The Monomagician

And what a week! Politically anyway. Not just from the perspective of what’s just happened in the US, but at work, the issues I mentioned in my previous post just won’t go away. I think the best strategy is to keep a low profile. Once the project goes live on December 1st, there will be so much back-slapping that whatever caused the original issues will have been forgotten.
Still on to more interesting things… I made three black and white prints using Permajet’s Fibre-based glossy paper this afternoon. It’s a thick, luxurious paper with a slightly textured finish. I used the Permajet ICC profile for the 3800 and the prints were spot on! Nice deep blacks, plenty of shadow detail. I would have taken hours to produce these in the darkroom. One was a scan from a very old negative taken with a Bronica ETRSi and 50mm lens.
The size of the negative meant that the scan resolution was relatively low and consequently there wasn’t much work to do in the cleaning department. It took a while to get the print to look “just so”…here’s an electronic version. Let me know what you think…

Wind-blown grasses and young oak trees in Savernake Forest, England

I’m in two minds as to whether use this shot for tomorrow night’s “Trees” competition at Shrivenham Camera club. The alternatives are:

Avenue of trees, Coate Water, Swindon

or

Horse Chestnut, Lydiard Park, Swindon

They all look lovely as prints. The last two by the way, were taken with a Leica M8 and the superb 28mm Elmarit ASPH lens. I treated myself to this lens in September and I have been blown away by it’s sharpness. It has become the ‘body cap’ on my M8.

The Horse Chestnut is my favourite of the three. This was quite a tricky shot, as I was shooting into the light. Rather than use the camera’s meter, I opted to use a hand-held meter and take an incident reading.  It took very little post-processing in Lightroom to produce what I believe is a “fine” print.  There were no blown highlights and there’s oodles of details in the shadows.  This is definitely one for the wall!

Or evenings, more like…The 3800 has been in place for six days and has had a fair amount of use by us both.  I saw my mate Phil Malpas at work this morning. He’s had a 3800 for almost a year and hasn’t had to change the inks yet.  He’s not exactly frugal with his printing either.  So it looks like it was the right decision from an economic perspective.

I cannot fault the image quality.  We’ve made prints on Epson Premium Glossy as well as Permajet’s Oyster 271 paper.  Both look great with colour and black and white images, but for me, the Permajet has the edge by virtue of its whiter base.  The Epson paper is positively creamy compared to the Permajet.

As I write this, I’m making my fourth A4 print on Permajet’s Classic Fine Art Fibre Base Gloss paper.  This is a 295gm² fibre-based paper.  The output is simply lovely.  I am chuffed to bits with the quality of the prints.  I want to try a couple fo the prints at A3 or even A2 if I can afford the paper.  It cost £1 per sheet at A4.  A pack of 25 sheets of A2 Classic Fine Art Fibre Base Gloss comes in at £94.95.  Not cheap, but in the immortal words of the Loreal adverts, I’m worth it!

To top it all, I even managed to take some pictures this lunchtime with my Canon G9, which I hope will have potential for my Picture a week project.

Less than twenty four hours after ordering an Epson Stylus Pro 3800 from Warehouse Express, I had a text message from Home suggesting that I might want to take the afternoon off work.  Sadly, I had to stay. Someone has to pay the bills…

When I finally got Home, there was a very large box in the hallway.  Our plan of campaign took shape over a cuppa and a carrot muffin.  First, empty the CIS ink tanks back into their original bottles, then make some space in the back bedroom, move the 2400 and then give the space where it had been a damned good dust.  I also took the opportunity to tidy up some of the cabling behind the PC and printer, which resembled an explosion in a spaghetti factory, with some curly cable tidying stuff that I had lying around.

Getting the box with the 3800 in it up the stairs wasn’t exactly difficult, but we were hindered by one rather inquisitive Samoyed with a penchant for cardboard packaging.  Moreover, having just had traction on my spine the day before, I had to be very careful not to undo the good work that my physio had done.  The right-angle bend at the top of the stairs added another slight challenge that was overcome with a little grunting and careful application of brute force.

Once the box with printer inside was in our study, there wasn’t much room for much else.  However, it only took a couple of minutes to get the printer out of the box and carefully heave it into position on the bench.

Once the printer was in position, it was time to power it up. After a few seconds of whirring, the door covering the ink tank bay opened.  The ink tanks are huge! They all required a good shake before being inserted into the printer.  Each one went in with a satisfying ‘click’.  When the door was closed, it was just a case of waiting about ten minutes while the printer charged the ink lines and went through whatever routines were necessary to set itself up.  Time for a spot of supper and a small beer!

So, supper finished and dishes in the dishwasher and it was time to connect the printer to the PC.  There was a bit of a hiccough when the Epson software said it could’t see the printer, but as Windows XP had detected it, I figured it was OK to continue.  When I went into the Printers and Faxes app on the Control panel, the printer was visible and I was able to run a test print from the Epson Stylus 3800 properties tab with no problem.

So, in total, I reckon it took about an hour, maybe an hour and a half to remove the 2400 from the study and install the 3800 in its place.  All that was left to do was fire up Lightroom and have a go at making some test prints.

The first print was a copy of this…

Port Quin, Cornwall

This was printed onto Epson’s Premium Glossy photo paper.  It looked stunning, even as a 9 x 6 print on A4 paper.  It was maybe a little dark, but that’s probably because I haven’t calibrated my monitor for a while.  I can’t wait to print it up on to A3 on Permajet’s Oyster 271 paper, which has a much whiter base than then Epson paper that I prefer.  It just looks cleaner to my eyes.

We decided to stop after five prints as it was getting late and I was a) thirsty and b) wanted to watch Thursday’s episode of “The Restaurant”.

OH HAPPY DAYS ARE HERE AGAIN!

So, after much ummming and ahhing, we’ve made a decision that was rather surprising.  Someone on the Talkphotography forum responded to an enquiry about printers, suggesting I take a look at the Epson 3800 printer.  His rationale was that the ink cartridges hold 80ml rather than the rather paltry 12.5ml on the 2400 and 27ml in the HP B9180.  His logic was that the printer comes with £500 worth of ink, so it would pay for itself in next to no time.

So we did a few sums and based on an assumption that all of the printers consumed the same amount of ink per print, and knowing that we replenished inks on the 2400 say 6 times per year, we were able to roughly estimate the running costs.

They went something like this:

The discounted price is because Epson are doing a promotion at the moment, rewarding customer loyalty. So my tired old broken 2400 is worth £150! Fantastic!

I know I had said I was reluctant to go for another Epson printer due to the lack of user-replaceable parts, but, if the printer is reliable and lasts more than two to three years, then we’ll be quids in.  In fact with the discounted price, running the Epson 3800 would cost just 16p more than the cost of the HP B9180 and a year’s supply of ink.

There is also the added bonus that we can print up to A2+ with the 3800 (not that it’s likely to be used that often, but still, it’s added value!).

The line to Warehouse Express will be red hot tomorrow morning!